Here's an example:
The judge has -- unexplainably in justice terms -- sided with this adulterous husband to the extent of actually having made reference in the court proceedings to the idea that he would be looking forward to how public schooling would "challenge" Vanessa's teaching of her rightfully-held and chosen faith in the minds of her children. Unexplainably because – for a judge's professional responsibility, he's supposed to be committed to fairness and impartiality and evidence and to protecting the innocent children in divorce cases, not treating them as rats in a maze. Instead his judicial favoritism pointedly sided with the public school option (cheapest for one party and on that party's demand list)...
Thanks to everyone who is writing about this case and drawing attention to the many injustices - and especially to homeschoolers who are looking past the superficial smokescreens and seeing the real issues and the real need to take action.



0 comments:
Post a Comment
Comments representing supportive or opposing views are welcome, provided they are genuine and reasonable. Anonymous comments are fine, but attacks hiding behind anonymity are more likely to be rejected.
If your comment does not appear, feel free to e-mail me at homeschool.injustice@gmail.com.